Jump to content

Section 92a and 92c of the Copyright Act


Carlos the Jackal
 Share

Recommended Posts

What are your thoughts on this latest totalitarian style government policy?

 

Section 92 of the Copyright Amendment Act assumes Guilt Upon Accusation and forces the termination of internet connections and websites without evidence, without a fair trial, and without punishment for any false accusations of copyright infringement. We should speak out against injustices like Guilt Upon Accusation being done in the name of artists and protecting creativity.

 

You can read more about it here http://creativefreedom.org.nz/s92.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Government has stalled a proposed law to enforce copyright on the internet after a "web roots" protest that blacked out sites yesterday.

 

Prime Minister John Key conceded that Section 92a of the Copyright Act could be "problematic", and suggested it could be thrown out.

 

go you good thing. hackers rock.

 

this is why the internet will never change.

the people that really run the show cant be fucked with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Government has stalled a proposed law to enforce copyright on the internet after a "web roots" protest that blacked out sites yesterday.

 

Prime Minister John Key conceded that Section 92a of the Copyright Act could be "problematic", and suggested it could be thrown out.

 

go you good thing. hackers rock.

 

this is why the internet will never change.

the people that really run the show cant be fucked with.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing specific is required in the law, this is literally all the law says...

 

An Internet service provider must adopt and reasonably implement a policy that provides for termination, in appropriate circumstances, of the account with that Internet service provider of a repeat infringer.

 

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2008/0027/latest/DLM1122643.html

 

 

"reasonably implement" suggests that validating the infringement notices against the IP logs we are required to have is required. That would be argued in court if it were not the case and the ISP would probably get stung.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Upcoming Events

    No upcoming events found
×
  • Create New...