Pakage Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 (edited) Full Length (12 Minute) "Fault Line" Gameplay Trailer All i can say is holy shit. This looks like the most intense / realistic game yet. Definitely on my shopping list. Pop it full screen on 720p for best results Edited April 17, 2011 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ignition Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Holy fuck, that looks awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Awesome Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 The bit at the end when the guy is mowin' down fools with the SAW on the bridge broke my suspension of disbelief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penco Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 loved all of the battlefield games. now i jsut need a rig that can acutally run this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakage Posted April 17, 2011 Author Share Posted April 17, 2011 added poll for added lolz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzp Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Woa thats sick. Wat sorta rig be required for that ya think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penco Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 from the bf3 website. Minimum System RequirementsProcessor: Dual Core Memory: 2 GB Hard Drive: 15 GB for Digital Version, 10 GB for Disc Version Video Memory: 256 MB Sound Card: DirectX Compatible DirectX: 10 Keyboard and Mouse DVD Rom Drive Recommended System Requirements Processor: Quadcore Processor Memory: 4 GB Hard Drive: 15 GB for Digital Version, 10 GB for Disc Version Video Memory: 512 MB Sound Card: DirectX Compatible DirectX: 11 Keyboard and Mouse DVD Rom Drive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Awesome Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Darn, I have all of that but no keyboard or mouse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakage Posted April 18, 2011 Author Share Posted April 18, 2011 obviously to get the kind of quality that they're getting on the video you'd need even higher specs again. when this comes out ill probably grab a 2nd 5870 XFX and run 2gigs of GDDR5 up in this bitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakage Posted April 18, 2011 Author Share Posted April 18, 2011 hmm, maybe not actually, might just upgrade. Nato (or anyone else), can you tell me why these 2 cards are the same price but ones 1GB and ones 2GB?? XFX HD-695A-CNFC Radeon HD 6950 2GB - $449 SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6950 1GB - $449 Might just sell mine and get a 2 x 2GB crossfire card setup since buying a 2nd one of my card would cost about the same as buying one with twice the memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeb Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 xbox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penco Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 FPS on consoles = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nato Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 hmm, maybe not actually, might just upgrade. Nato (or anyone else), can you tell me why these 2 cards are the same price but ones 1GB and ones 2GB?? XFX HD-695A-CNFC Radeon HD 6950 2GB - $449 SAPPHIRE Radeon HD 6950 1GB - $449 Might just sell mine and get a 2 x 2GB crossfire card setup since buying a 2nd one of my card would cost about the same as buying one with twice the memory. You don't want those cards man. It's not all about amount of memory. Your 5870 is faster than a 6950 in some titles so it isn't really a big step up, and at 1920x1200 in most modern games video memory isn't the limiting factor, it's raw processing power. You'd be moving from a high end last gen card to a middle of the road current gen card and not really getting a worthwhile improvement. For this generation I'd go for nVidia anyway. What I'd really recommend though for this gen is SLI'd 570's. They are cooler and quieter than the amd's, considerably faster and only marginally more expensive. But anyway, don't buy anything now planning for BF3. It's not out for a while and there will be more cards out before then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakomi Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 FPS on consoles = It's all about what you're used to, get over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakage Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 FPS on consoles = It's all about what you're used to, get over it. Fact: Console Gaming is holding back Game Tech. and a mouse can aim way faster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hakomi Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 FPS on consoles = It's all about what you're used to, get over it. Fact: Console Gaming is holding back Game Tech. and a mouse can aim way faster Please show me evidence of this fact. Some people like one some people like the other, not sure why people get so worked up about it. They both have positives and negatives and are made for different groups of people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penco Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 http://bf3blog.com/2011/04/dice-consoles-are-holding-pc-games-back/ DICE: Consoles are holding PC games back DICE has always stressed that the main platform for Battlefield 3 is the PC, which will also get some exclusive features, most notably 64 player support (as opposed to only 24 for consoles). In one of his many recent interviews, this time with Nvidia fan site GeForce, DICE executive producer Patrick Bach responded to a question regarding PC versus consoles, and it was clear that Bach and DICE are in favor on PCs at this point. Asked specifically whether he feels if consoles are holding PC gaming back, Bach replied 'Yes, Absolutely', and added 'That's the biggest problem we have today'. He went on, saying that most games are made for the lowest common denominator (i.e. consoles), and that console games are generally ported to the PC with some higher resolution textures. Bach stressed that DICE is doing the opposite with Battlefield 3 ? the PC version is the lead version and the console versions will be scaled down, as opposed to console version being scaled up to the PC. Despite favoring the PC platform, DICE has always stated that the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions will look just as good as anything on the console market today. Bach also commented on whether the Frostbite 2.0 engine will be licensed out to other developers, which he denied with a firm ?No?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nato Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 FPS on consoles = It's all about what you're used to, get over it. Fact: Console Gaming is holding back Game Tech. and a mouse can aim way faster Please show me evidence of this fact. Some people like one some people like the other, not sure why people get so worked up about it. They both have positives and negatives and are made for different groups of people. The point that Craig was making is that game developers are now slowing down on advancing graphics technology because they need to make games which run on the consoles as well as pc's. Until we get a new generation of consoles this will be the case for all games designed to run on the 3 main platforms. Only PC exclusives will truly make an attempt to utilise pc hardware to it's fullest. It's as close to a fact as you can get given that Patrick Bach, the executive producer on BF3 has mentioned this in a few interviews recently. I think he knows what's up. http://www.maximumpc.com/article/gaming/dice_consoles_are_holding_pc_games_back_bf3_aiming_fix Edit// Shit beaten to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Grant Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 PS3 / XBox won't be running this game on full graphics either. Won't be able to handle it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Awesome Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 It's also worth noting that there are architectural differences between the GPUs (and CPUs) in consoles -PS3's atleast- compared with off the shelf PC hardware. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeb Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 i just prefer sitting on the couch to play video games instead of sitting at a desk.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Steppa Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 i just prefer sitting on the couch to play video games instead of sitting at a desk.. Feel way less g33k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeb Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 im not the biggest fan of running round getting shot at anyway. paintball is humiliating enough,i dont need little kids (and everyone else in the world)owning me with pretend automatic weapons. all about this at my house: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nato Posted April 19, 2011 Share Posted April 19, 2011 It's all about this at my place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pakage Posted April 19, 2011 Author Share Posted April 19, 2011 released yesterday eh? Im buying this when i get home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now